Aim: The author undertakes to present the work of the case law analysis group as the leader of the jurisprudence analysing group by examining the judicial interpretation of human trafficking of the Supreme Court.
Methodology: In the first part of the study, in addition to indicating the subject of the study, the formation and work of the group so far are presented. The circumstances of the formation in the midst of the unexpected COVID pandemic and how the group’s work was affected by the unusual fact that the legal regulations of the area under investigation have changed completely shortly after its formation are detailed.
Findings: In the second part of the paper, as a hypothesis of the jurisprudence analysis group, a detailed article is written on the changes in the legal situation and judicial practice of trafficking in human beings, answering the question of systemic difficulties in enforcing with other legal facts deeply rooted in the Hungarian legal system, what solutions did the law enforcer and the legislator seek to solve these problems and what can be expected in the application of the law after the last, complete restructuring of the legal facts of human trafficking.
Value: Through the presentation of the work of the Suprem Court’s case law analysis group, research on changes in the legal facts and judicial practice of human trafficking can be read.