Aim: The aim of the study is to present the non-state actors in the field of security, the special bodies, the ‘peripheries’ of law enforcement, and the application of methods other than the traditional concept of law enforcement.
Methodology: This paper examines the state and non-state actors involved in the creation and maintenance of security through a new and very exciting lens, sometimes highlighting particularly sensitive issues, and tackling a particularly interesting and topical problem of violence, the cult of violence, and the proliferation of unwanted structural situations and sources of danger, in order to reduce, if possible.
Findings: The police, as the public actor in creation of our security, and in particular the activities of police organization, have been and are still being dealt with in many different ways. However, only very few police researchers have focused their attention on non-state actors in the field of security, on the specialized organs and ‘peripheries’ of policing, on the use of methods other than those that might be called traditional policing.
Value: The author of the study wishes to contribute to the comprehensive scientific research and mapping of private security, recognizing the fact that the topic under research is a constantly topical issue of police operation, as the last two decades have brought about a number of unprecedented situations in the operation of the police. The quantitative and qualitative transformation of tasks and expectations also requires a reassessment of the relationship between state and non-state actors in the creation and maintenance of security. This study will help to explore these activities.